SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IQRAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Criminal Appeal No 2319 of 2022

(Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 8238 of 2022)

Iqram

… Appellant

versus

The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

… Respondents

J U D G M E N T

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI

1

Leave granted.

2

The facts of the present case provide another instance, a glaring one at that,

indicating a justification for this Court to exercise its jurisdiction as a protector of

the fundamental right to life and personal liberty inhering in every citizen. If the

Court were not to do so, a serious miscarriage of justice of the nature which has

emerged in the present case would be allowed to persist and the voice of a

citizen whose liberty has been abrogated would receive no attention. The history

of this Court indicates that it is in the seemingly small and routine matters

involving grievances of citizens that issues of moment, both in jurisprudential

and constitutional terms, emerge. The intervention by this Court to protect the

liberty of citizens is hence founded on sound constitutional principles embodied

in Part III of the Constitution. The Court is entrusted with judicial powers under

Article 32 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top