Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SALMAN AHMAD CHOWDHURY – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of salman's conviction and scj's orders (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. conclusion on the court's dismissal of the review (Para 2) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding the forfeiture order (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. high court's review powers on procedural matters (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. analysis of evidence and its relation to the forfeiture (Para 18 , 19 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. comparison to guan hin enterprise and its implications (Para 24 , 25) |
Introduction
[1] In a letter dated 6 May 2025, the Applicants, Salman Ahmad Chowdhury ("Salman") and Agensi Pekerjaan Insight Alliance Sdn Bhd ("the agent"), involving two different criminal case numbers before the Session Court (PATI), applied to this Court to exercise its revisionary power to revise the learned Session's Court Judge's (SCJ) decision dated 16 February 2025 particularly on an order made by the SCJ to forfeit the moneys amounting to RM723,000.00 which the prosecution tendered in the trial and the SCJ marked it as exhibit P36.
[2] Having perused the letter and the documents tendered as exhbits before the SCJ, the Court decided to hear the application in open Court. The Court then heard the revision appli
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
