SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1894

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
VASANTHAN NAGAPPEN – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's application for amendment relates to including additional defendants. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. examination of limitation period and circumstances for fraudulent concealment. (Para 7 , 8 , 22)
3. amendment necessary to fully present the plaintiff's case. (Para 31 , 32 , 37)
4. court has wide discretion to allow amendments in interests of justice. (Para 36 , 52 , 56)
5. court grants application to amend with order as to costs. (Para 59)
Abdul Wahab Mohamed J:

Introduction

[1] This is my judgment on the Plaintiff's application in encl 11 to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim to include the 2nd through 23rd Defendants pursuant to O 20 r 5(1) of the Rules of Court 2012. The application was filed subsequent to a successful Pre-Action Discovery Application filed under O 24 r 7A of the Rules of Court 2012 and ss 6 and 42 of the Government Proceedings Act 1956 (" GPA 1956").

[2] The pivotal question in this application is whether the amendment to include additional Defendants is time-barred by virtue of s 2(a) of the Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 (" PAPA 1948"), and whether any delay by the Plaintiff in seeking the amendment is inordinate and unexplained

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top