HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PUREGEN TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MILLENNIUM ECO TECHNO SDN BHD – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This appeal was filed by the defendant against the decision of the Sessions Court which allowed the plaintiff's claim for unpaid invoices in the sum of RM394,232.38 with costs.
[2] The plaintiff had also filed a cross-appeal challenging the decision of the Sessions Court. The cross-appeal was directed against the Sessions Court's decision to award statutory interest instead of the contractual interest of 1.5% per month as expressly stipulated in the invoices.
[3] After carefully perusing the record of appeal and considering the submissions of both parties, I found no cogent reasons to interfere with the findings of the learned Sessions Court Judge. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's cross-appeal were accordingly dismissed. Costs of RM10,000.00 were awarded in respect of dismissal of the appeal while costs of RM5,000.00 were awarded in respect of dismissal of the cross-appeal.
Brief Background Facts
[4] The defendant had engaged the plaintiff as its subcontractor through a Letter of Award dated 19 May 2017 ("Letter of Award"). The scope of work under the subcontract required the plaintiff to design, supply, install, test and commission
Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan Malaysia v. Konsortium JGC Corporation & Ors
Assa Abloy Malaysia Sdn Bhd v. Emir Enterprise Sdn Bhd
Era Kemuncak Jaya (M) Sdn Bhd v. Tenaga Switchgear Sdn Bhd
Xcess Networks (M) Sdn Bhd v. Huawei Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd
Lianmark Sdn Bhd v. Al-Ambia Sdn Bhd
Sambaga Valli KR Ponnusamy v. Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur & Ors And Another Appeal
Popular Industries Ltd v. The Eastern Garment Manufacturing Co Sdn Bhd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.