Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
HILTI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BYTEERING SDN BHD & ORS (ENCL 3) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for interim injunction and grounds. (Para 1) |
| 2. plaintiff's factual background and claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. defendants' objections and arguments. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. interlocutory injunction principles discussed. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. court's analysis and findings on case merits. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. finding on adequacy of damages as remedy. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 7. conclusion on injunctive relief dismissal. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
Introduction
[1] Enclosure 3 is the Plaintiff's application for an interim injunction pursuant to O 29 r 1 and/or O 92 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC) for the following orders:
1. An injunction to restrain the Defendants from:
Approach, contact, call, correspond, take, entice, induce, solicit, persuade and/or otherwise deal with each and every customer of the Plaintiff whose names are as set out in Annexure A hereto; Approach, contact, call, correspond, take, entice, induce, solicit, persuade and/or otherwise deal with each and every employee of the Plaintiff to solicit, elicit, procure and/or obtai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
