SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1380

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MAA CREDIT BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
BEST BIRDSNEST SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Teoh Chye Yi,Cheong Tick Soon ,Respondent Advocate: Mohammad Danial Hazizan,Amber Tan Wey

Table of Content
1. facts leading to the applications for stay. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 9 , 11 , 12)
2. arguments made by both parties regarding stay applications. (Para 14 , 15)
3. court's observations on the legal principles for granting stays. (Para 16 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 26)
4. ratio decidendi regarding unconditional vs. conditional stays. (Para 18 , 23 , 24)
Wan Muhammad Amin Wan Yahya J:

[1] This was 3 applications by the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants ("Defendants") respectively for stay of execution of the Judgment and Order dated 8 December 2023 pending their appeals to the Court of Appeal (collectively "the Applications").

[2] considering the submissions of all parties and the applicable legal principles, I allowed a conditional stay. My reasons are as state below.

[A] Salient Background Facts

[3] The salient facts leading to the Applications are as stated below.

[4] The Plaintiff granted a loan of RM24,500,000.00 to the 1st Defendant pursuant to a Moneylending Agreement dated 13 July 2021 ("the Agreement").

[5] The 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants executed guarantees to secure repayment of the loan.

[6] Third party charges were provided by Alam Pahlawan Sdn Bhd over land held under HS(D) 37724] PT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top