Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KEMAS MAJU CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD & OTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commencement of adjudication proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of subcontract and payment claims (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. adjudicator's decision and claims (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. parties' dissatisfaction and appeal (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. purpose of cipaa 2012 (Para 15) |
| 6. preliminary objections raised by kemas maju (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. kemas maju's grounds for setting aside and stay (Para 29 , 30) |
| 8. court's analysis on natural justice (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. independence and impartiality of the adjudicator (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 10. jurisdictional challenges against the adjudicator (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 11. application for stay of execution (Para 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 12. conditions for enforcement of adjudication decision (Para 75 , 76) |
| 13. conclusion and order of the court (Para 77) |
A. Introduction
[1] On August 2024, Master Craft Group Sdn Bhd (Master Craft) had commenced an Adjudication Proceedings pursuant to the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA 2012) against Kemas Maju Sdn Bhd (Kemas Maju) to claim a sum of RM1,389,572.92 as the unpaid sum. The Adjudicator, Mr Wilfred Abraham, decided in favour o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
