Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
WANG JIN – Appellant
Versus
KAN WENG HIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for taxation of costs (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts of the case (Para 4) |
| 3. preliminary issues raised by the defendant (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. distinction of cited cases (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's view on the application of lpa (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. procedural compliance under roc (Para 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. application of section 130 of lpa (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. procedural fairness in litigation (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. merit of the plaintiff's taxation application (Para 31 , 32) |
| 10. principles of taxation summarized (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 11. court's findings on the purported invoice (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 12. conclusion on the defendant's claims (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 13. final decision regarding the os (Para 56) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiff filed an application by way of Originating Summons (OS) dated 28 April 2022 (encl 1) under various provisions of the Legal Profession Act 1976 ( LPA ) and the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC) for inter alia, taxation of the Defendant's bill of costs.
[2] The Plaintiff's OS seeks the following reliefs:
2.1. That the Defend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
