SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1574

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
AFFIN BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
LION GOLD ENTERTAINMENT SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Venukumar Sivasamy ,Respondent Advocate: Fatimatuz Zahra Suhaimi

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claim and summary judgment application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. background facts of loan agreement and defaults. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. parties' arguments on summary judgment. (Para 19 , 20)
4. legal standards for granting summary judgment. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. court's analysis on validity of documents. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
6. court's view on defendants' claims of misunderstanding. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
7. court's findings on omitted material facts. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
8. court's ruling on certificate of indebtedness. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
9. conclusion on summary judgment application. (Para 57 , 58)
Anand Ponnudurai J:

Introduction

[1] This is a case where the Plaintiff bank commenced proceedings against the Defendants, claiming a total outstanding sum of RM5,222,509.10 being an amount due and owing as at 4 October 2024.

[2] Pursuant to the filing of their statement of defence, the Plaintiff had thereafter filed an application in encl 8 dated 14 December 2024 seeking summary judgment to be recorded against the De

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top