Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA GURNEY PARAGON RESIDENTIAL – Appellant
Versus
HUNZA PROPERTIES (GURNEY) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed for committal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. counsel's retraction of claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judgment not enforceable by committal. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. prima facie case for contempt. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. evidence of acts contrary to judgment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. types of contemptuous conduct. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. interference with the administration of justice. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. judgment must specify performance time. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. requirement for penal notice in committal proceedings. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. distinction in procedural requirements. (Para 38 , 39 , 41 , 42) |
| 11. importance of goj in understanding judgment. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 12. non-disclosure of facts not sufficient to set aside. (Para 54 , 56) |
| 13. claims made by p regarding abuse of process. (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
Prelusion
[1] I delivered a post-trial judgment in this case on 26 June 2024 (Judgment). I then gave my written grounds of judgment on 18 September 2024 (GOJ).
[2] On 27 January 2025, the 1st to 3rd Defendants (Ds) filed an ex parte application for leave to commence committal proceedings against the Pl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
