SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1790

HIGH COURT MALAYA KLANG
PERRESIA RESOURCES (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PERSPEKTIF MASA SDN BHD & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background facts and context of the dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. discussion on locus standi and the agent-principal relationship. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. implications of the deed of settlement. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. assessment of lad claims and their legitimacy. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. final verdict and dismissal of claims. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
Norliza Othman J:

[Full Trial]

A. Background Facts

[1] Suit No.: BL-22NCVC-21-06/2023 (known as Suit 21) and Suit No.: BL-22NCvC-22-06/2023 (known as Suit 22) will be decided together since both are tried together. The documents are common for both suits

The Plaintiff were purchasers of two (2) units of condominium under the D'Rapport Festa, Ampang ("Project") developed by the Defendant.

[2] Parties then entered into two (2) Sale and Purchase Agreement, both dated 22 February 2011 ("SPA") with the purchase price of RM1,060,200.00 and RM1,056,700.00 respectively ("Properties"). Plaintiff claims that the purchase price were paid by 3rd party consideration, which was the debt owed by the Defendant to one Juruukur Bahan FPPS Sdn Bhd ("FPS") to which a Deed of Settlement dated 29 August 2013 was entered between FPS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top