Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ULTIMATE PALMS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MENA JAYA SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's claim against the initial ruling. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. emails establish contract terms and potential renewal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 19) |
| 3. errors in previous court findings corrected. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. final ruling on the appeal dismissal. (Para 65) |
A.Introduction
[1] This is the Appellant's appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge that had allowed the Plaintiff's / Appellant's claim but only allowed damages to be paid by the Respondent / Defendant to the sum of RM 116,299.60.
[2] This Appeal was also heard together with the Respondent's Appeal bearing number WA-12BNCC-19-07/2024. The Respondent's appeal is on the basis that the learned Sessions Court Judge should not have allowed the Plaintiff's / Appellant's claim in toto.
[3] For ease of reference, the Appellant shall be referred to as the Plaintiff and the Respondent shall be referred to as the Defendant.
[4] After hearing arguments by counsels for the Plaintiff and the Defendant, this Court finds that this is a suitable case for this Court to vary the orders of the Sessions Court and dismiss the Defendant's appeal.
B. Backgroun
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
