Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
HOO WEI MENG – Appellant
Versus
WONG ZI PING – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. loan transaction details and context. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. plaintiff misled regarding documents signed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. transfer of land occurred without consent. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. plaintiff's and defendant's claims outlined. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. court's determination of the spa's validity. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. no valid payment for the spa's purchase price. (Para 25 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. delay in transfer completion raised suspicion. (Para 44 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 8. defendant's lack of possession indicates intent. (Para 55 , 56) |
| 9. buy-back clause suggests sham agreement. (Para 57 , 60) |
| 10. loan deemed illegal under moneylenders act. (Para 61 , 62 , 66 , 70) |
| 11. spa's illegality renders transfer void. (Para 74 , 76 , 82 , 84) |
| 12. conclusion and order for title reversion. (Para 85 , 86 , 87) |
Introduction
[1] This suit concerns a piece of land situated at Daerah Seberang Perai Tengah, Pulau Pinang ("land"). Originally, the land was owned by the Plaintiff ("P"). It was subsequently transferred to the Defendant ("D"). P claims that the transfer is void and sues to recover the land.
[2] Afte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
