Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GLOBAL MARITIME VENTURES BERHAD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
IZLIN ISMAIL & ORS (ENCLS 140 141 147 151 157 159 16.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for discovery by plaintiffs. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. causes of action and financial details. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal framework for discovery applications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments from plaintiffs and defendants. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. ratio decidendi on discovery provisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. court's observations on relevance and necessity. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. conclusion of the court's decision. (Para 38) |
[Enclosure 140: Application for Discovery pursuant to Order 24 Rule 7A(2) Rules of Court 2012 and/or Section 7 of Bankers' Book (Evidence) Act 1949]
Background
[1] This is an Application for Discovery by the Plaintiffs against 3rd Parties (Malayan Banking Berhad & HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad) pursuant to O 24 r 7A(2) of the Rules of Court 2012 and/or s 7 of the Bankers'Book (Evidence) Act 1949 (Act 33) for the following orders:
(a) that Malayan Banking Berhad (1st Discovery Defendant) and HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad (2nd Discovery Defendant) do, to the best of their ability after making all reasonable enquiries, answer the questions set out in Schedule A;
(b) th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
