Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BUKIT KIARA PROPERTIES SERVICES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
GUNALAN & ASSOCIATES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff seeks leave to amend claims. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on the defendant's objection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. defendant argues delay constitutes tactical maneuver. (Para 6 , 7 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. plaintiff contests existence of defendant. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 5. court emphasizes procedural governance. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. court evaluates substantiation of amendments. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. court scrutinizes delay explanations. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. justice overrides technical non-compliance. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. court's analysis leads to dismissal. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
[1] This is the Plaintiff's Notice of Application filed on 14 April 2025 pursuant to O 20 r 5 and/or O 92 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 for the following orders:
(i) That leave be granted to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim dated 2 March 2020 (Encls 1 and 2), in the manner where the proposed amendments have been underlined in red ink as shown in the Proposed Amended Writ and Proposed Amended Statement of Claim (Proposed Amendments), which are annexed to the Notice of Application filed herein;
(ii) That the costs of this application be costs
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
