HIGH COURT MALAYA MUAR
PP – Appellant
Versus
RENGADORAI PERUMAL & ORS – Respondent
[Criminal Trial No: 45B-05-06-2016 & 45B-06-06-2016]
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] This is an oral application by the Learned Deputy Public Prosecutor to impeach the evidence of a prosecution witness PW21 who was said to have departed from the police statement he made pursuant to s 112 Criminal Procedure Code . It was applied for by the Learned Deputy in the middle of the evidence-in-chief of PW21.
[2] The application for this impeachment is made pursuant to ss 145 and 155 Evidence Act 1950 .
Background Facts
[3] PW21 knew the Deceased (Aris bin Hakim) since 8 years ago because they stay in the same village ie Kampung Paya, Layang- Layang and on the 13 September 2015 between 5 pm to 6 pm PW21 was at Kampung Jaya Sepakat, Layang-Layang. Then he went out of his house to purchase some drugs. The place or station to transact in drugs (which is colloquially known as "port") is in the Parit area. At about 6 pm, he arrived at the "port".
[4] He saw a lot of people at the "port". They are Malays, Chinese and Indians. A few minutes later he saw the Deceased came on a motorcycle with a friend Jufri.
[5] The Deceased went to sit with a group of people and suddenly there was a commotion. That group was about 20 metres away from where PW21 was seated. PW21 soon left the place. During the commotion he did not see any weapon. Some were holding parangs (local machetes) but nothing happened. He saw the Deceased quarrelling. He could not identify the Indian man who was quarrelling with the Deceased.
[6] At this stage the learned Deputy applied to cross examine PW21 because of material contradictions in his evidence in court and that of the statement he gave to the police pursuant to s 112 Criminal Procedure Code .
[7] The material parts are found as follows:
i. Page 2 as highlighted in coloured pen.
ii. Page 3 at para 1, middle page and para 2.
iii. Page 4, para 2 & 4.
[8] I perused over the marked paragraphs of the various pages of PW21 statement taken by the police pursuant to s 112 Criminal Procedure Code . I found there are material discrepancies with the oral testimony given on oath on the witness stand in court. I allowed the application to cross examine PW21.
[9] PW21 admitted that he had his statement taken by an Inspector in the Malay Language.
[10] He understood the questions posed to him and answered them and there was no problem in communicating with the Police Inspector. PW21 admitted he signed on the statement and showed to the court his signature on the statement at the bottom of every page and at the end of his statement on the last page. He admitted that statement as his and upon the Learned Deputy's application, this court marked it as P50.
[11] The Learned Deputy then applied for impeachment proceedings to commence against PW21 and I allowed it. The court invited the Learned Deputy to commence the proceedings:
i. In his testimony on oath, PW21 told the court he entered the "port" about 6 pm but left about 6.15 pm to 6.20 pm but at p 4 of his section-112-statement (P50) he told the Inspector that he was there for over 1 hour.
The explanation PW21 offered was that he could not remember the time but it was between 6 pm - 7 pm but he only remember that it was before dusk sets in.
ii. In his oral testimony he told the court that he does NOT know Nandu while at pp 2, 3 and 4 of his police statement (P50), he knew who Nandu was.
His explanation was that he did not know who is Nandu but merely heard of his name because he is a "tokan" (drugs supplier / pusher).
iii. At p 2 of P50 he said that he and Jufri went to pick up Aris because Nandu told him to do so but he told the court in oral testimony that he did not know Nandu.
His explanation was that he did not know Nandu but he heard of his name because many people kept mentioning that name to him.
iv. PW21 told the court that only when he was on the way home from the "port" he crossed path with the Deceased but in P51 he told the police he was loitering or hanging around ("melepak") at the "port" when he met the Deceased.
His
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.