HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MKP BUILDERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PC GEOTECHNIC SDN BHD (ENCL 1) – Respondent
A. Background
[1] Panzana Enterprise Sdn Bhd (Panzana) had appointed MKP Builders Sdn Bhd (MKP) as a sub-contractor for the construction of a highway, "Lebuhraya Bertingkat Damansara-Shah Alam" (Project).
[2] By a letter of award dated 21 May 2018, MKP appointed PC Geotechnic Sdn Bhd (PCG) to do bored piling works in the Project (Works).
[3] On 15 April 2019, Panzana had terminated MKP's appointment as a sub-contractor of the Project.
[4] MKP terminated PCG's appointment on 21 May 2019.
[5] PCG claimed that MKP owed money to PCG for the Works performed by PCG up to 31 January 2019 (PCG's Claim).
[6] PCG's Claim was referred to adjudication before Ir Dr Wong Fook Keong (Adjudicator) under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA).
[7] On 12 December 2019, the Adjudicator delivered an adjudication decision [AD (PCG-MKP)] which adjudicated that, among others, MKP shall pay to PCG a sum of RM7,996,928.59 [Adjudicated Amount (PCG-MKP)] for the Works together with interest and costs as stipulated in the AD (PCG-MKP).
[8] With regard to the AD (PCG-MKP):
(1) the following two originating summonses (OS) had been filed:
(a) MKP had filed OS No BA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.