SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 1399

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
LAW WAI LING & ORS – Appellant
Versus
CHE RUSHITA @ RUSHITA ISMAIL & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Tun Abd Majid Tun Hamzah J:

[1] The plaintiffs filed this originating summons ("Application") for what they described as a consequential order. Having heard the parties I dismissed the Application with costs.

[2] In this Application the plaintiffs sought for the following:

2.1 Lot tersebut dibahagikan dalam dua (2) plot seperti ditunjukkan di 'PP-1 'di sini dan dua (2) dokumen Hakmilik Keluaran (Issue Document of Title) berasingan masing- masing dikeluarkan;

2.2 Dokumen Hakmilik untuk Plot 1 seperti ditunjukkan atas 'PP- 1 'dikeluarkan atas nama plaintif-plaintif manakala dokumen Hakmilik untuk Plot 2 dikeluarkan atas nama defendan- defendan;

2.3 Pendaftar Hakmilik Tanah, Pulau Pinang dan/atau mana- mana pihak Pendaftar lain memberi kesan kepada Perintah di sini mengikut s 417, Kanun Tanah Negara, 1965;

2.4 Segala kos permohonan ini dan kos sampingan ditaksirkan dan dibayar oleh pihak defendan-defendan kepada pihak plaintif; dan

2.5 Perintah atau relif selanjutnya yang dianggap wajar oleh Mahkamah mulia ini.

[3] The plaintiffs and the defendants were co-proprietors of a piece of land Lot 187, Geran Mukim No 115, Mukim A, Daerah Barat Daya, Pulau Pinang ("land"). Earlier vide PA-24N


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top