Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PP – Appellant
Versus
WONG WENG HENG – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges against wong weng heng for drug trafficking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. prosecution claims prima facie case; defense questions evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and prosecution's burden. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 4. failure to prove possession and trafficking. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 5. court acquits accused due to lack of evidence. (Para 54) |
[1] The accused, Wong Weng Heng was charged with 2 charges of trafficking in dangerous drugs to wit, 63.9g of 3,4- Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 203.6g of Methamphetamine under s 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act") respectively and one charge for possession of 149.7g of Etizolan under s 30(3) of the Poisons Act 1952 ("Act 366").
[2] The charges are as follows:
First Charge
"Bahawa kamu pada 8 Januari 2021 jam lebih kurang 4.30 petang bertempat di kawasan lorong belakang bangunan HSBC Bank, Jalan Metro Perdana 1, Kepong, di dalam daerah Sentul dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
