HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
OXBRIDGE HEIGHT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
HAMIDI AHMAD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review arises from tribunal's lad award. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. principles of certiorari in judicial review are outlined. (Para 2) |
| 3. claim procedures inadequately followed by tribunal. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 4. claims without evidence can be legally erroneous (Para 5) |
| 5. legality based on respondents' financing status debated. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. tribunal's ruling on unforeseen circumstances clarified. (Para 10) |
| 7. tribunal must adhere to statutory obligations (Para 11) |
[1] This application for judicial review for an order of certiorari to be issued arises out of the decision of the Tribunal For Homebuyers Claims (the Tribunal) to make an award of liquidated ascertained damages (LAD) to the respondents/homebuyers. The applicant (A) was a licensed housing developer while the respondents were purchasers of a residential unit in the housing project undertaken by A. The parties had entered into a sale and purchase agreement (SPA) in the statutory form which stipulates that delivery of vacant possession by the developer to the purchaser shall be within 24 months after execution of the SPA. Failure to deliver vacant possession to the respondents within the stipulated period was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.