Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
CHEAH CHENG HUAT – Appellant
Versus
AIG MALAYSIA INSURANCE BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. preliminary objection on appeal competency. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. consequences of allowing or dismissing the objection. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. interpretation of s 28(1)(a) of the cja. (Para 7 , 8 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. clarification of monetary limits in appeals. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. analysis of appeal scenarios under s 28(1)(a). (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 6. determination of whether appeal is on a question of law. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 7. final interpretation of appeal competency. (Para 70 , 71) |
| 8. conclusion and order regarding appeal. (Para 72) |
(Allowing Preliminary Objection That The Appeal Is Incompetent)
Prelusion
[1] The Appeal before me is a post-trial appeal from the Sessions Court. But at the hearing of the Appeal, the Respondent/Defendant (D) raised a preliminary objection against the competency of the Appeal.
[2] The Defendant submits that s 28(1)(a) of the Courts Of Judicature Act 1964 (CJA) prohibits an appeal from the subordina
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
