HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
KOLEJ UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
DR MUHAMMAD OMAR – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This appeal deals with a short legal point. But it is an important point.
[2] I have written this Judgment as I have taken judicial notice from a few appeals before me that some lawyers are not aware that "no appeal shall lie to the High Court from a decision of a subordinate Court in any civil cause or matter where the amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter is ten thousand ringgit or less except on a question of law."
[3] This filter is set out in s 28(1) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 ["CJA"].
[4] The respondent/plaintiff had sued for RM3,000.00. After full trial he was awarded judgment for RM3,000.00 and costs of RM100.00 from the Magistrate. Dissatisfied, the appellant/defendant had filed an appeal to the High Court.
[5] However, as the amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter is ten thousand ringgit or less, the appeal must be on a question of law.
[6] I had dismissed the appeal on 10 November 2022 as the appellant/defendant had not raised any question of law in this appeal. These are my Grounds of Decision.
[7] Parties shall be referred to as they were cited at the Magistrate's Court.
Background Facts
[8] The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.