SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 792

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
KOLEJ UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
DR MUHAMMAD OMAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Leong Wai Hong JC:

Introduction

[1] This appeal deals with a short legal point. But it is an important point.

[2] I have written this Judgment as I have taken judicial notice from a few appeals before me that some lawyers are not aware that "no appeal shall lie to the High Court from a decision of a subordinate Court in any civil cause or matter where the amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter is ten thousand ringgit or less except on a question of law."

[3] This filter is set out in s 28(1) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 ["CJA"].

[4] The respondent/plaintiff had sued for RM3,000.00. After full trial he was awarded judgment for RM3,000.00 and costs of RM100.00 from the Magistrate. Dissatisfied, the appellant/defendant had filed an appeal to the High Court.

[5] However, as the amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter is ten thousand ringgit or less, the appeal must be on a question of law.

[6] I had dismissed the appeal on 10 November 2022 as the appellant/defendant had not raised any question of law in this appeal. These are my Grounds of Decision.

[7] Parties shall be referred to as they were cited at the Magistrate's Court.

Background Facts

[8] The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top