Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
RASIP HAMSUDI & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal involves procedural claims concerning the proper inclusion of parties in legal actions. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. overview of the case, procedural context and parties involved. (Para 6) |
| 3. the arguments revolve around whether the 3rd defendant was correctly included in the judgment. (Para 11 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. arguments presented by the 3rd defendant regarding liability and cause of action. (Para 13 , 20) |
| 5. court's observations on the procedural aspects affecting judgment. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. final decision regarding the irregularity of the judgment leads to the appeal's acceptance. (Para 26 , 43 , 48) |
| 7. court's analysis leading to the decision on the irregularity of the judgment. (Para 38 , 40 , 50) |
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant who is the 3rd Defendant against the order of the Sessions Court dated 11 April 2016 dismissing the Appellant's application under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of 2012 ( ROC 2012) to remove its name as the 3rd Defendant from the judgment of the Sessions Court Selayang dated 28 April 2015.
[2] There was a civil suit filed by the Respondents, who are the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Plaintiffs against the 1st and 2nd Defendants in one accident case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
