Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA MELAKA
NURI MAYA SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
AWAN PLASMA SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs' case details (Para 3) |
| 2. consultancy agreement details (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defendant's disputes (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. core issues identified (Para 9) |
| 5. burden of proof principles (Para 10) |
| 6. defendant's release from agreement (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. agreement against public policy (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 8. court's final decision (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT
A. Introduction
[1]This is a decision at the end of a full trial. The Plaintiffs' claim against the Defendant is for the payment of remuneration in consideration of the Plaintiffs' performance of their consultancy services to the Defendant in relation to a reclamation and water chalets project in the State of Melaka.
[2] The Plaintiffs called 4 witnesses whilst the Defendant called 3 witnesses.
B. Plaintiff' Case
[3] The Plaintiff's case is that sometime early 2007 the Defendant approached the Plaintiffs seeking their services ('Services') to advise, negotiate, assist and liase with the State Government of Melaka ('State Government') in securing the rights to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
