SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 3441

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
CHIA AI MIN & 18 ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Freda Sabapathy ,Respondent Advocate: Siti Norliza Abdullah

JUDGMENT

Shahnaz Sulaiman JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the appellants against the decision of the Magistrate's Court in convicting and sentencing the appellants from a charge under subsection 6(1) of the Common Gaming Houses Act 1953 .

[2] At the conclusion of the hearing, this Court dismissed the appeal. This is the grounds of decision containing the full reasons for the decision of this Court.

Background

The Charge

[3] The charge against the appellants was framed as follows:

"Bahawa kamu dengan niat bersama pada 21 February 2021 jam lebih kurang 3.45 petang di rumah No 3122 Lorong Cendana 2 Taman Desa, dalam daerah Mersing, dalam Negeri Johor, telah berjudi di rumah perjudian terbuka, oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah s 6(1) Akta Rumah Judi Terbuka 1953 dan boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen yang sama dan dibaca bersama-sama s 34 Kanun Keseksaan."

Proceedings At Magistrate's Court

[4] At the Magistrate's Court on 31 March 2021, the charge was read out and explained to all 19 of the appellants. All the 19 appellants pleaded guilty to the charge. The learned Magistrate being satisfied that all 19 of the appellants understood the nature of the charge


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top