Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
BALACHANDAR RATHNAM & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application for identity card issuance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of identity card application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. legal grounds for judicial review. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. arguments for the applicant's citizenship claim. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. respondent's defense regarding application status. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. court's analysis of discretion and burden of proof. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 7. conclusion dismissing the judicial review application. (Para 50) |
[1] This is an application for Judicial Review pursuant to O 53 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012. The crux of the case for the applicants revolves on the "alleged refusal and/or failure" of the respondent to issue a National Identity Card to the third applicant, when the third applicant turned 12 years old.
Reliefs Sought
[2] In this application for judicial review pursuant to O 53 of the Rules of Court 2012, the applicants are seeking the following reliefs:
a) that the applicants be given the permission to apply for an order of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
