Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MOHD SUHAILY TAMBI – Appellant
Versus
DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application initiation and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. reliefs sought by the applicant. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 3. arguments from both parties. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 4. legal principles for discovery in judicial review. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's analysis of the respondent's actions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. relevance of whatsapp communications. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. court's view on delay in filing discovery. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. conclusion on the merits of the discovery application. (Para 38) |
Introduction
[1] The Applicant filed an application for a judicial review dated 8 July 2021 (encl 1) under O 53 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC) to challenge the Demolition Order issued by the Respondent on 30 April 2021 in respect of the Applicant's premises at No 23, Jalan Pantai Murni 3, Pantai Hill Park, 59200 Kuala Lumpur.
[2] The Applicant had filed the discovery application dated 20 December 2021 (encl 21) under O 53 r 6 of the ROC read together with O 24 r 11(2) of the ROC to seek discovery and inspection of the following documents in relation to the Applicant's ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
