ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD vs AMBROSE ANAK JEWON

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 MarsdenLR 119

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AMBROSE ANAK JEWON – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for intervention in insurance proceedings. (Para 1 , 4 , 6)
2. background facts regarding the claims and applications. (Para 2 , 3 , 5)
3. applicability of locus standi for the intended intervener. (Para 7)
4. analysis of statutory obligations of insurers under rta. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. court's analysis of statutory provisions on insurance and third-party rights. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

[1] Vide Notice of Application dated 7 April 2017 [Encl 8], the Intended Intervener applied for an order that leave be granted to the Intended Intervener to be added as a party/co-respondent to the proceeding and a stay to be granted on the hearing of the Originating Summons until the Court orders otherwise.

Background Facts

[2] Vide the Originating Summons in Encl 1, the Applicant applied for a declaratory order that the insurance through Certificate No TGPC-PC195025-BRTQKVCH [the said Policy] covering the period from 30 July 2012 to 29 July 2013 and which covered the insured vehicle at the material time of the alleged collision was void and unenforceable [the said DO].

[3] On 2 September 2012, an accident occurred between the Intended Intervener's vehicle and the vehicle of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 MarsdenLR 119

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHINGETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD – AppellantVersusAMBROSE ANAK JEWON – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AMBROSE ANAK JEWON – Respondent