SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 747

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SOONG KOK JONG – Appellant
Versus
AHMAD TARMIZI ADNAN – Respondent


Suraya Othman J:

[1] This is an appeal by the defendant against the decision of the learned Session Court Judge ("SJ"). In her decision, the learned SJ gave judgment for the plaintiff and found the defendant 100% liable. The defendant, unhappy, appealed against the decision of the SJ on the issue of liability only. I heard the appeal and allowed liability to be apportioned 50:50. The defendant, still dissatisfied appealed against my decision.

Brief Facts

[2] On 13 February 2011 at about 12.00 midnight, the plaintiff was crossing a road while pushing his bicycle. It was at Jalan Batu 18 Rawang ie KL-Ipoh (Rawang) route. The plaintiff crossed from right to left, ie from A2 to A1.

[3] According to the plaintiff (SP1) the collision occurred when he had nearly arrived at the other end of the road and he marked the point of impact as 'X' in the sketch plan.

[4] The plaintiff testified that he looked left and right before crossing the road and he did not see any approaching vehicle. He later then said that he did not see the defendant's motorcycle because it was driven too fast. He said that there was a traffic light located near the road.

[5] The plaintiff averred in his statement of claim tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top