HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ORIX LEASING MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ROSSINGTON CONSOLIDATED SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural orders for owing debts and creditor meetings. (Para 1 , 1 , 5 , 10) |
| 2. factual setting of the case concerning the appointment of the coi. (Para 2 , 4 , 8) |
| 3. legal obligations regarding proof of debt and their verification. (Para 3 , 6 , 12) |
| 4. importance of independent coi representation for creditors. (Para 19) |
[1] Enclosure 74 is the Applicant's (Harlina Abdul Aziz) application pursuant to O 32 r 6 of the Rules of the 2012 and s 289 and/or s 241 of the Companies Act 1965 for the following orders,
1) Leave be granted to the Applicant to intervene in the proceedings;
2) The Ex-parte Order dated 13 June 2014 be set aside;
3) The Ex-parte Order dated 13 June 2014 be stayed pending the disposal of the application;
4) If prayer (2) is granted, a meeting of the creditors and contributories be called, held and conducted by the Liquidator within twenty-one (21) days from the order to consider and approve:-
i. the formation of the Committee of Inspection (COI); and
ii. the determination of the composition of members of the COI.
5) The Liquidator be appointed as Chairman of such meeting of creditors and contributories and to produce a report of the result to the Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.