SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1279

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
HAIRUDIN HARON & ORS – Appellant
Versus
SEE YONG TECK & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. basis for rescission of a spa. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. legal framework for contract rescission. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. court's analysis on contract impossibility. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

[1] This application vide Originating Summons ('OS') arises out of a sale and purchase agreement ('SPA') dated 13 July 2012 entered into between the Plaintiffs and Defendants for the sale of a plot of land in Mukim Tanjung Kupang, district of Johor Bahru to the Defendants. The Plaintiffs herein now seek rescission of the SPA, return of the deposit to the Defendants and costs of and incidental to this application. They sought the following reliefs:

"(a) the Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 13 July 2012 ("the SPA") entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants in respect of the sale of the land held under GM 301, Lot 2117, Mukim Tanjung Kupang, Daerah Johor Bahru ("the said land") be rescinded;

(b) the sum of RM129,683.70 be paid back by the plaintiffs to the defendants;

(c) the costs of the action.".

Material Facts

[2] These are, briefly, the undisputed facts. Originally and till the date the SPA was ente

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top