SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1347

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
AUSTIN POWDER ASIA PACIFIC INC – Appellant
Versus
TROPICANA CORPORATION BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Gregory Das ,Respondent Advocate: Parvinder Kaur

Choong Yeow Choy JC:

Introduction

[1] The rules of court confer wide discretionary powers on the Courts to permit applications by litigants to amend their writs and pleadings. The provisions governing this aspect of practice and procedure are couched in liberal terms Be that as it may, it is commonplace that in exercising these discretionary powers, the Courts are bound by established principles and are predisposed to the factual matrix of the case before them.

[2] The present application concerns an application by the Plaintiff to amend its statement of claim. This necessitates a consideration by this court of the applicable principles and the grounds and facts in support of and against the application.

The Overriding Issue

[3] The primary issue for determination in this present matter is whether the application by the Plaintiff in encl 72 to amend its statement of claim ought to be allowed.

[4] Arising from the above are the followings subsidiary issues, namely;

(a) Whether there has been a delay on the part of the Plaintiff in making this application;

(b) Whether the amendment is bona fide;

(c) Whether the amendment will change the character of the pleaded case; and

(d) Whether this amend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top