STT TECHNOLOGIES SDN BHD vs GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:Muhammad Nazrin Harith Mohd Mahyudin,Norhabibi Talib ,Respondent Advocate: Nik Mohd Nik Kar,Muhammad Asraf Shahbuddin

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claim for compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. trial witnesses and agreed issues. (Para 7)
3. claim dismissed after review. (Para 8)
4. burden of proof lies with plaintiff. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. existence of post-contract questioned. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
6. no formal agreement post-expiry. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. plaintiff's arguments lack evidence. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
8. tender process initiated by defendants. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
9. comparison with precedent case. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
10. plaintiff's claim for quantum meruit dismissed. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
11. proof of quantum required. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
12. vague invoices weaken plaintiff's case. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
13. conditions for compensation under contracts act. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
14. evidence of damages must be established. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
15. claims must be substantiated with evidence. (Para 55 , 56)
16. failure to prove claims leads to dismissal. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
17. final dismissal of plaintiff's claim. (Para 61)

John Lee Kien How @ Mohd Johan Lee J:

Introduction

[1] This is the Plaintiff's claim ("this Claim") against the D