KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA & ANOR vs AIDIL ABAS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1557

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
AIDIL ABAS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Natrah Mazman ,Respondent Advocate: Muhammad Asif Zahari

Table of Content
1. introduction of appeal and court's decision. (Para 1 , 2)
2. principles of appellate intervention. (Para 3)
3. plaintiff's claims and issues for trial. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. sessions court findings on attendance. (Para 7 , 8)
5. court's analysis on evidence and errors. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. summary of conflicting oral evidence. (Para 12 , 13)
7. contemporaneous documentary evidence. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
8. court's intervention based on evidence. (Para 21 , 22)
9. determination of the plaintiff's entitlements. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
10. conclusion and orders of the court. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)

Tee Geok Hock J:

Introduction

[1] In this appeal after full trial, his Court on 6 September 2023 allowed the Appellant/IGP's appeal in part, reduced the amount of arrears in salaries and allowances awarded by the trial Court, and ordered the costs of appeal be borne by the respective parties. An outline summary of reasons were also given to the parties when this Court delivered the decision dated 6 September 2023.

[2] Dissatisfied, the Respondent/Aidil has applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal, which in turn led to the Court of Appeal's instruction that grou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1557

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAMKETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA & ANOR – AppellantVersusAIDIL ABAS – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
AIDIL ABAS – Respondent