Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AFFAN MOHD NAWI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
LAKEFRONT RESIDENCE SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promissory obligations of developers (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. background of the housing project and parties (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 3. planning permissions and amendments (Para 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29) |
| 4. defendants' arguments against plaintiffs' claims (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 5. trial process and witness testimonies (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 6. agreed issues for trial (Para 48 , 61 , 62) |
| 7. interpretation of spas under hda 1966 (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 8. plaintiffs' claims regarding construction obligations (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 9. representations made by the defendants (Para 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116) |
| 10. final decision and orders (Para 165) |
Introduction
[1] " 'Kata itu kota" is a well-known peribahasa. It means that every promise made must be honoured. Its English equivalent is "A man 's word is his bond".
[2] In the instant case before me, the plaintiff's learned counsel Ravindran Shanmuganathan submits that there is a prevalence of developers riding roughshod over the Latin maxim Omnia promissa servanda, "All promises must be kept".
[3] He urges me to hold t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
