SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 584

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
REMEGGIOUS KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
SKS SOUTHERN SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lum Kok Kiong,Tan Ming Chu ,Respondent Advocate: Chen Wai Jiun

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction of the tribunal under hda 1966. (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal interpretation of split claims. (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 16)
3. damages related to non-connection of utilities. (Para 22 , 23)
4. final judgment allowing the appeal. (Para 25)
Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal FCJ:

Introduction

[1] The appeal concerns the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for Home Buyers Claims ("Tribunal") in respect of ss 16Q and 16M of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act, 1966 ("HDA 1966"). Specifically, the appeal concerns important questions as to jurisdiction of the Tribunal in respect of split claims as well as issues pertaining to the delivery of vacant possession.

[2] The present appeal emanates from a judicial review application filed by the respondent to review the award of the Tribunal dated 16 January 2019 ("the Award"). The Tribunal had allowed the claim of the appellant. The High Court dismissed the respondent's judicial review application on 22 September 2019. The Court of Appeal, however, allowed the respondent's appeal, set aside the said High Court order and quashed the Award of the Tribunal on 2 November 2020.

[3] Undeterred, the appellant successfully obtained leave of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top