SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1245

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
EMPIRE HOLDINGS LTD – Appellant
Versus
ITHMAAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD & ORS – Respondent
[Suit No: WA-22NCC-295-07/2021]



Petitioner Advocates:Tan Sri Dr Muhammad Shafee Md Abdullah,So Chien Hao,Fatin Izyan,Muhamad Fadzil,Genevieve Bridie Vanniasingham ,Respondent Advocate: Datin Jeyanthini Kannaperan,Koo Yin Soon,Koo Jia You

A party's burden of proof remains, regardless of the opposing party's failure to call evidence.

Headnote:This judgment examines the claims made by the Plaintiff regarding alleged breaches by the Defendants in the sale of shares. Under the applicable law, specifically the Capital Market and Services Act 2007, the Plaintiff contended that the shares were sold below their market value. The Court found that no notice was required for the sale as per the security documents, thereby dismissing all claims. The primary issues revolved around the alleged undervaluation of shares and the duty of care by the involved parties. The judgment concluded that EHL failed to establish its case, resulting in a dismissal.

Table of Content
1. plaintiff alleged breaches in sale of shares. (Para 1 , 3 , 27)
2. court emphasized need for adequate proof for undervalued claims. (Para 72 , 84 , 90)
Ong Chee Kwan JC:

Introduction

[1] This judgment, delivered after trial, deals with the claims by the Plaintiff that the 1st and 2nd Defendants had breached their duty to the Plaintiff in the sale of certain shares of Turiya Berhad to the 3rd Defendant following from the Plaintiff's failure to meet its payment obligations under a banking facility. The shares were securities charged under the banking facility. The Plaintiff contended that the said shares were sold below their fair market price.

[2] The Plaintiff contended that the 4th Defendant, who was a director of the 2nd, 3rd and 5th Defendants at the material times owed a duty to the Plaintiff and had acted in breach of the same.

[3] The Plaintiff also claimed that the Defendants had conspired to defraud and injure the Plaintiff by their unlawful acts and had acted in breach of the provisions of the Capital Market and Services Act 2007 and the Malaysian Code of Take-Overs and Mergers 2016.

[4] At the end of the Plaintiffs' case, the Defendants made a common submission of no case to answer and elected not to call any witnesses.

Background Facts

[5] The Plaintiff, Empire Holdings Ltd ('EHL'), is a company incorporated in the Republic of Seychelles, having its registered address at Abacus (Seychelles) Limited, Mont Fleuri, Mahe, Seychelles.

[6] EHL is wholly owned by one Tan Sri Datuk Mohan MK Swami ('TSM'). EHL previously held 66.67% of the ordinary shares in Turiya Berhad ('Turiya'), the 5th Defendant herein ('EHL's Turiya Shares').

[7] The 4th Defendant, Tunku Dato' Yaacob Khayra ('TDYK') is the Executive Chairman and a Director of the 3rd Defendant, MAA Group Berhad ('MAA').

[8] TDYK was appointed as an independent non-executive director of Ithmaar Bank and Ithmaar Holdings Ltd on 18 April 2019. TDYK was appointed as a non-independent non-executive director of Turiya on 26 November 2019.

[9] Abdullah Taleb holds the position of General Manager in Ithmaar Bank and he is also a non-independent non-executive director in Turiya.

[10] On or about 20 April 2008, EHL and the 1st Defendant, Ithmaar Development Company Ltd ('IDC') entered into a Murabaha Facility Agreement ('Facility Agreement'), whereby a banking facility was granted by IDC to EHL for a maximum sum of USD 83,000,000.00 ('the Facility'). The other party to the Facility Agreement was Shamil Bank of Bahrain BSC,which merged with and formed Ithmaar Bank, now known as Ithmaar Bank BSC, the 2nd Defendant herein ('Ithmaar Bank') in or around 2016.

[11] The Facility was to finance EHL's voluntary take-over offers of Turiya (formerly known as Sitt Tatt Berhad) and Chase Perdana Berhad (now known as Chase Perdana Sdn Bhd) ('Take-over Offers').

[12] Under the terms of the Facility Agreement, EHL was required to repay IDC the sum of USD 99,960,000.00 by the maturity date on 15 April 2019.

[13] The Facility was secured by a Share Charge dated 20 April 2008 and a Charge Supplement dated 28 October 2015 (collectively referred as 'the Share Charges') entered into between EHL and IDC whereby EHL:

(a) charged the shares it acquired pursuant to the voluntary Take-Over Offers which included 64.99% or equivalent to 148,651,497 of EHL's Turiya Shares to IDC ('the Charged Securities'); and

(b) assigned to IDC all rights, interest and claims (including voting rights) as beneficial owner of the Charged Securities ('the Assigned Rights').

[The Charged Securities and Assigned Rights together with the Charged Moneys as defined in the Share Charges are collectively referred as the 'Charged Assets']

[14] The Share Charges were entered into and executed as a continuing security for the prompt payment, performance and discharge of the Secured Obligations (as defined in the Share Charges) by EHL, which included the payment of all sums due or owing under or in connection with the Facility Agreement.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top