Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LAI SOON ONN – Appellant
Versus
CHEW FEI MENG & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's appeal dismissed due to insufficient standing under cmsa. (Para 1 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. recognized the plaintiff's standing as defined in cmsa. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. prior sc ruling necessary for statutory claims against alleged contraventions. (Para 8 , 32 , 35) |
| 4. explored the cumulative requirements for locus standi under cmsa. (Para 13 , 14 , 25 , 34) |
| 5. court discussed non-joinder of parties and its implications on legal outcomes. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. final decision affirms dismissal of plaintiff's claims and appeal. (Para 74 , 75) |
[1] The appellant (plaintiff in the High Court) appeals against the decision by the learned Judicial Commissioner (JC) in allowing the application by the 1st-4th respondents (1st-4th defendants in the High Court) in striking out the writ and the Statement of Claim of the appellant under O 18 r 19(1)(a) of the Rules of 2012.
[2] Parties shall be referred to as they were, in the High Court. The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th defendants will be referred to as D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 respectively.
[3] Each of the defendants filed their appeal to the Court of Appeal separately as follows:
- Civil Appeal No: W-02(IM)(NCC)-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
