SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1784

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
HEN – Appellant
Versus
HIN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Kuah Jiun Yu ,Respondent Advocate: Goh Hui Hui

Table of Content
1. application for variation of decree nisi. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. issues considered by the court. (Para 6)
3. procedural objections and their implications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. consent orders and their variation in matrimonial cases. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. definition of material change in circumstances. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. access to children and its relation to maintenance obligations. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
7. variation of maintenance terms not allowed. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
8. final decision on access terms. (Para 43)
Evrol Mariette Peters J:

Introduction

[1] This was an application ("this Application") by the Petitioner husband in encl 23, seeking to vary certain terms of the decree nisi dated 17 May 2017 ("the Decree Nisi").

[2] In the interest of privacy of the parties concerned, and sensitivity of the issues in these proceedings, the Petitioner Husband, Petitioner Wife, and their two children have been anonymised in this judgment as HEN, HIN, MEY, and TEL respectively.

The Factual Background

[3] In accordance with the Decree Nisi, custody of the two children ("the Children")

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top