SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 1963

HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
PP – Appellant
Versus
SOGAS TRADING – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Nur Azureen Zainalkefli ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Khairul Fairuz Rahman

JUDGMENT

Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid JC:

Preface

[1] By a letter dated 13 November 2019 the Prosecution wrote to this Court seeking this Court's powers of revision with regards to the conviction and sentence that was passed by the Sessions Court on the Respondent ("Application").

Background

[2] The Respondent was charged with an offence under reg 21(1) of the Control of Supplies Regulations 1974 ("Regulations") and punishable under s 22(1) of the Control of Supplies Act 1961 ("Act").

[3] The Charge read as follows ("Charge"):

Bahawa kamu pada 28 September 2017, lebih kurang jam 10.45 pagi di premis Sogas Trading beralamat No Lot 20034, Mukim 11, Kampung Bukit, 11900 Bayan Lepas di dalam Daerah Barat Daya dalam Negeri Pulau Pinang sebagai seorang Pemegang Lesen Runcit (No KR 06273) Barang-Barang Kawalan Berjadual iaitu Gas Petroleum Cecair dengan Had Kuantiti sebanyak 1500 kilogram telah didapati memiliki sebanyak 3906 kilogram Gas Petroleum Cecair melebihi had kuantiti yang dinyatakan di dalam lesen yang mana telah melanggar Peraturan 10(1) Peraturan-Peraturan Kawalan Bekalan 1974 dan oleh yang demikian satu kesalahan di bawah Peraturan 21(1) Peraturan-Peraturan Kawalan Bekalan 1974 dan bole


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top