SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 1626

AUGUSTINE PAUL
TAN LAY CHEN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - Kuldip Singh; M/s Kuldip Singh & Assocs For the respondent - Lukman Zainuddin, Jabatan Peguam Negara

Augustine Paul J:

The accused in this case was charged with being in possession of 3.9 grammes of heroin and 33.2 grammes of monoacetyl-morphines under s. 12(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and punishable under s. 39A(2) of the same Act. On 6 June 2000 he pleaded guilty to the charge. The learned Sessions Court judge convicted the accused and imposed a sentence of 12 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the rotan. This appeal is by the accused against the sentence imposed.

The facts of the case outlined by the prosecution revealed that on 6 August 1999 the complainant Inspector Haslah bt Bachok together with a police party raided premises number Lot 626, Batu 5, Jalan Gombak. The police searched the premises in the presence of the accused and recovered a blue bag. The bag contained several packets suspected to contain dangerous drugs. The accused admitted that the packets belonged to him. The packets were later sent to the chemist for analysis who confirmed that it contained dangerous drugs as specified in the charge. The accused admitted the facts and the learned Sessions Court judge accepted the guilty plea. In his plea in mitigation the accused prayed for leniency. He said t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top