SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1792

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KOTA KINABALU
PP – Appellant
Versus
NEMI IBRAHIM – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the alleged offences and evidence presented. (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. charges against the respondent and grounds of appeal. (Para 2 , 3)
3. doubts raised regarding the prosecution's case (Para 6)

[1] The Respondent was charged with three offences under s 379 of the Penal Code for dishonestly withdrawing cash on 2 September 2013 from a Bank Simpanan Nasional account belonging to one Mariana Binti Duali. At the end of the prosecution's case the learned Magistrate ruled that the prosecution had failed to make out a prima facie case against the Respondent, acquitted and discharged her of the three offences.

[2] The three charges read as follows:

(i) Bahawa kamu pada 2 September 2013 jam lebih kurang 1512 Hrs di ATM Bank Simpanan Nasional No ID: 1098 O Cawangan Beaufort Sabah, di dalam Daerah Beaufort, Negeri Sabah, telah mencuri dengan mengeluarkan wang sebanyak RM1,500.00 melalui mesin ATM padahal kamu tahu wang di dalam akaun tersebut bukan kepunyaan kamu, oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen 379 Kanun Keseksaan.

(ii) Bahawa kamu pada 2 September 2013 jam lebih kurang 1513 Hrs di ATM Bank Simpanan Nasional No ID: 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top