SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1545

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
LEE AH KONG @ LEE MUK SANG – Appellant
Versus
WINGS LOGISTIC SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under s 181 of the companies act 1965. (Para 1 , 1)
2. procedural observations on affidavit-based determination (Para 14 , 35 , 58)
3. petition under companies act 1965 (Para 25 , 54 , 56)
4. details of the company's operations and structure. (Para 26 , 40 , 53)
5. principles guiding s 181 applications. (Para 41 , 43 , 48)
6. legal standards regarding 'oppression' under s 181 (Para 47 , 51)
7. allegations of oppressive conduct and management issues. (Para 52 , 62 , 72)
8. concerns over administrative costs and lack of compensation to the petitioner. (Para 75 , 78)
9. petitioner's complaints of oppression and management issues (Para 76 , 88)
10. petitioner's claim for share purchase by the second respondent. (Para 85 , 92)
11. arguments against the petition being a method of pressure. (Para 114 , 117)
12. final judgment and dismissal of the petition (Para 119)
13. court’s dismissal of the petition based on evidence presented. (Para 120)

[1] Enclosure 1 is a petition filed under s 181 of the Companies Act 1965 for, inter alia, an order that the second respondent, Chew Khoon Aik, shall purchase the entire 7% shareholding of the petitioner in Wings Logistic Sdn Bhd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top