SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 2067

HIGH COURT MALAYA MUAR
FARIDAH MD LAZIM (AS THE LAWFUL HOLDER OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY TO AHMAD ADAM) – Appellant
Versus
EDHAM ABD GHANI (A.... – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: JB-24NCVC-410-11/2019]



Petitioner Advocates:Hishamudin A Aziz ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Yamin Ismail,Mohd Ashri Rais

The Plaintiff as an Administrator has the locus standi to apply for land subdivision under Section 145 of the National Land Code despite the Defendant's lack of cooperation.

Headnote:(A) National Land Code 1965 – Section 145 – Application to subdivide land held under joint ownership was sought due to the Defendant's refusal to cooperate – Refusal obstructed the Plaintiff's efforts to legally subdivide the land. (Paras 3, 7, 49)

(B) Locus Standi and Jurisdiction – The Court affirmed that the Plaintiff, acting as Administrator under valid Power of Attorney, has locus standi to initiate action regarding land subdivision despite challenges on power validity. (Paras 8, 26, 32)

(C) Power of Attorney – Cited case law clarifies that Power of Attorney does not require determinate authentication by the trial Court when properly registered. (Paras 29, 30)

Facts of the case: The Plaintiff seeks to subdivide land in the District of Muar, which she co-owns with the Defendant, who obstructs the application despite the legal requirement for a subdivision. The land is held under title GRN87189, formerly GRN9603.

Findings of Court: The Court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, allowing the subdivision and empowering the necessary officials to act on behalf of the Defendant.

Issues: 1) Whether the Plaintiff has locus standi; 2) Reasonable grounds to oppose the application; and 3) Jurisdiction of the Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that valid kinship and administrative rights entitle the Plaintiff to claim the orders sought, asserting jurisdiction under statutory provisions.

Result: Orders for land subdivision were granted in favor of the Plaintiff. (Paras 49)

JUDGMENT

Awg Armadajaya Awg Mahmud JC:

(Enclosure 1 & 22)

Introduction

[1] There are 2 applications here, one is the Originating Summons (Enclosure 1) and another is the application to struck out encl 2 vide Notice of Application (Enclosure 22).

[2] The Orders sought for in encl 1 are as follows:

i. that the piece of land held under the Title which is known as GRN 87189 (formerly known as GRN 9603) Lot 1439, Bandar Maharani, in the District of Muar, in the State of Johore as per the proposed land division be allowed;

ii. that the Deputy Registrar and / or the Senior Assistant Registrar and / or Land Administrator and / or Plaintiff and / or Solicitors be granted the power to sign all the proposed plans for the application of Land Subdivision and the application forms and / or other documents for / or on behalf of the Defendants as required to complete the process of subdivision and the issuance of separate individual titles for the said land as proposed;

iii. that the Administrator of Land and Minerals of Johore and / or any relevant parties to give effect to the Order and to receive as authentic any forms or documents which were signed in accordance with this Order and to give effect to the subdivision of the said land until the separate individual land titles have been issued in accordance with proposed plan;

iv. the cost to be borne by the Plaintiff;

v. other reliefs or orders as the Court thinks fit and just.

[3] The basis of the application pursuant to the Originating Summons are as follows:

a. The Plaintiff as the Administrator of the Estate of Ahmad bin Adam who is the legal owner of 64/101 share of a property / land held under the title as GRN87189 (formerly known as GRN 9603) Lot 1439, Bandar Maharani, in the District of Muar, in the State of Johore applied to the Land Administrator's Office for the subdivision of the land.

b. The Defendant being the legal owner of 37/101 share of the said property / land refused to give cooperation by signing the relevant documents to give effect to the subdivision.

c. That the Land and Minerals Office of Johore / Muar Land Office insisted that the relevant documents for the subdivision be signed before the subdivision may be effected registration be done.

d. The refusal of the Defendant to sign the relevant documents for the subdivision of the said property / land has hindered the Plaintiff's application for subdivision at the Land and Minerals Office of Johore / Muar Land Office.

e. As such, a Court Order is needed for the purpose of carrying out and registering the subdivision.

[4] The Cause Papers are as follows:

i. Originating Summons (Enclosure 1).

ii. Affidavit-in-support (Enclosure 2).

iii. Affidavit-in-opposition (Enclosure 10).

iv. Affidavit-in-reply (Enclosure 11).

v. Reply to the affidavit-in-opposition (Enclosure 18).

vi. Notice of application (Enclosure 22).

vii. Affidavit-in-support of application pursuant to encl 22 (Enclosure 23).

viii. Affidavit-in-Opposition against the Application (Enclosure 26).

ix. Reply to the Affidavit-in-opposition (Enclosure 27).

x. Affidavit-in-reply to the Affidavit-in-opposition (Enclosure 28).

Background Facts

[5] The husband of the Plaintiff and the father of the Defendant are co-proprietors of an undivided property / land held under the title as GRN87189 (formerly known as GRN 9603) Lot 1439, Bandar Maharani, in the District of Muar, in the State of Johore in the following shares:

i. The Plaintiff holds 64/101 of the undivided shares.

ii. The Defendant holds 37/101 of the undivided shares.

[6] After the passing of both the husband of the Plaintiff and the father of the Defendant, the Plaintiff wishes to sub-divide the land but was unable to so as the Defendant opposed the move. The Defendant was said to have denied any co-operation. Hence the application vide Originating Summons pursuant to s 145 National Land Code 1965 . The Defendant is the administrator of the estate of his father.

The Issues In This Application

[7] As the issues in encl 1 and Enclosure 22 are over


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top