COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SIDAMBARAM TOROSAMY – Appellant
Versus
LOK BEE YEONG – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant's claim rests on the deceased's intentions regarding property and loans. (Para 1 , 12) |
| 2. the appeal primarily revolves around the claims made due to power of attorney and trust. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. consideration of financial transactions as evidence of trust further complicates the case. (Para 4 , 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. judicial interpretation of power of attorney forms a pivotal issue regarding irrevocability. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. court grapples with the definitions of duties under a power of attorney. (Para 16) |
[2] The primary facts supported by evidence in our own words are as follows:
(i) the plaintiff had given financial assistance to the deceased on various occasions, and even after death;
(ii) the deceased had given a Power of Attorney to the plaintiff to sell his bunga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.