HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MACLY EQUITY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PRESTIJ MEGA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD (ENCL 5) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for stay of adjudication decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on the construction contract and delays. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. allegations of errors in adjudication decision. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. issues of urgency and inconsistency in claims. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
(Enclosure 5)
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiff had by way of encl 5 (Encl 5) and pursuant to s 16 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA") and/or O 69A r 4 of the Rules of court 2012 applied to stay the Adjudication Decision dated 9 February 2023 ("AD") granted in favour of the Defendant pending the final disposal of the arbitration proceedings between the Plaintiff and the Defendant commenced by way of Notice of Arbitration dated 28 April 2023.
[2] The grounds in support of encl 5 were inter alia as follows:
2.1 Pursuant to a Letter of Award dated 14 May 2014 ("LOA") and subsequently Articles of Agreement dated 13 April 2015 incorporating the Conditions of Building Contract (Private Edition Without Quantities - PAM Revised 2006) ("Contract") for the Construction and Completion of Basement and G
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.