HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
YEE YEW CHUIN – Appellant
Versus
LEE BEE PENG (ENCL 17) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for document production in divorce case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. background facts of marriage and separation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. preliminary objections raised by the petitioner husband. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments by respondent wife on necessity of documents. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court’s analysis on the relevance of documents. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. conclusion on allowed documents and court's reasoning. (Para 41 , 42 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 7. final order and decision of the court. (Para 67) |
[Lampiran 17]
Introduction
[1] This is an application ('Enclosure 17") by the Respondent Wife ("RW") for an order that documents be produced by the Petitioner Husband ("PH"). This application is made to support relief related to the wife's maintenance claim in the answer to the PH's Divorce Petition against the RW.
[2] This application is made under O 24 r 10 of the Rules of Court 2012 (" ROC 2012"). This Court on 27 September 2023 has allowed some of the documents obtained and now states the reasons for doing so. The parties are referred to as the were in the High Court.
Cause Papers
[3] The
Susila S.Sankaran v. Subramaniam P Govindasamy
Allianz General Insurance Company (Malaysia) Berhad v. Chubb Insurance Malaysia Berhad
Cho Sok San v. Khoo Owt Lee; Au Mui Yoon (Third Party)
Armor Multi Systems Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Yew Sair Lai & Ors
Sivajothi K Suppiah v. Kunathasan Chelliah
Ngan Chan aka Ngan Chan Liquor Trade & Ors v. Hai-0 Enterprise Bhd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.