SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1307

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
YEE YEW CHUIN – Appellant
Versus
LEE BEE PENG (ENCL 17) – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Poon Lee Fah ,Respondent Advocate: Lee Kheng Hong

Table of Content
1. application for document production in divorce case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. background facts of marriage and separation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. preliminary objections raised by the petitioner husband. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. arguments by respondent wife on necessity of documents. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court’s analysis on the relevance of documents. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. conclusion on allowed documents and court's reasoning. (Para 41 , 42 , 63 , 64 , 65)
7. final order and decision of the court. (Para 67)
Azizan Md Arshad JC:

[Lampiran 17]

Introduction

[1] This is an application ('Enclosure 17") by the Respondent Wife ("RW") for an order that documents be produced by the Petitioner Husband ("PH"). This application is made to support relief related to the wife's maintenance claim in the answer to the PH's Divorce Petition against the RW.

[2] This application is made under O 24 r 10 of the Rules of Court 2012 (" ROC 2012"). This Court on 27 September 2023 has allowed some of the documents obtained and now states the reasons for doing so. The parties are referred to as the were in the High Court.

Cause Papers

[3] The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top