Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
Evrol Mariette Peters, J
GONG – Appellant
Versus
HONG – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners were married (Para 3) |
| 2. petitioner-wife filed this application (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. importance of complying with the rules (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101) |
| 4. application was dismissed (Para 102) |
Introduction
[1] This was an application ("this Application") in encl 13 by the Petitioner-Wife, who sought to vary the terms of a consent order granted in March 2021.
[2] In the interest of privacy of all parties concerned, and sensitivity of the issues in these proceedings, the Petitioner-Husband and Petitioner- Wife have been anonymised in this judgment as GONG and HONG respectively.
The Factual Background
[3] The Petitioners ("the Parties") were married in December 2006, and were blessed with three
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
