SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 874

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MAH SAU CHEONG – Appellant
Versus
TAN ENG CHIN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Asok Kandiah,Navindran Sivarajah ,Respondent Advocate: Shanmuga K,Ng Chek,Jonas Lee

JUDGMENT

Choo Kah Sing J:

Introduction

[1] The plaintiff's claim is for a refund of money paid to the defendant pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement dated 7 January 2014 (hereafter "the SPA") which, according to the plaintiff's narrative, stood as terminated. The parties have gone through a full trial. On 26 July 2021, this Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim. The reasons for the decision are set out as below.

The Background Facts

[2] According to the SPA, the plaintiff agreed to purchase and the defendant agreed to sell 625,000 shares (hereafter "the shares") in a foreign incorporated company known Xianda International (HK) Limited (which was previously known as Enersave International (HK) Limited) for a consideration sum of RMB5,739,093.00. The parties agreed the amount of RMB5,739,093.00 was equivalent to RM3,000,000.00 (hereafter "the consideration sum").

[3] The payment of the consideration sum was in two tranches. The first payment totalling RM2,954,388.44 was to be paid within one month upon the signing of the SPA. The second payment or the final payment totalling RM45,611.56 was payable within two months from the "Closing Date". Article 1.3(b) of the SPA in respect of the sec


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top