HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CIMB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
JARING COMMUNICATIONS SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the progress of the winding-up proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments concerning the company’s solvency. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. public interest considerations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court's reasoning against oppressive claims. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
Introduction
[1] This was a petition by CIMB Bank Berhad ("CIMB Bank"), the Petitioner, to wind-up the respondent company, Jaring Communications Sdn Bhd. By an agreement ("the Agreement") made between CIMB Bank and the respondent, the bank did agree to extend and did avail an overdraft facility of up to a limit of RM10,000,000.00 and a bank guarantee facility of up to a limit of RM8,000,000.00 (with a sub-limit of RM1,000,000.00) to the respondent.
[2] Pursuant to an event of default by the respondent, CIMB Bank commenced Kuala Lumpur High Court Suit No 22NCC-194-06/2014 against the respondent. The event of default occurred when the respondent, in breach of the express written terms of the said Agreement, failed and neglected to obtain CIMB Bank's prior written consent and approval for change in the respondent's directors a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.